SSL/early TLS may be used by POS POI terminals that are verified as not susceptible to known exploits.

SSL/early TLS may be used by POS POI terminals that are verified as not susceptible to known exploits.

• A. False
• B. Unsure
• C. True
• D. Not Applicable

Answer: (C)

SSL/early TLS is typically discouraged because these protocols have known vulnerabilities and are not suitable for protecting cardholder data in transit. Yet there is a narrowly defined allowance within PCI guidance for POS POI terminals that have been tested and verified as not susceptible to those known exploits. If a device can be demonstrated to be resistant to the identified vulnerabilities and is deployed with appropriate risk controls—such as strong network segmentation, restricted access, and ongoing monitoring—then using SSL/early TLS for that specific terminal can be permitted. This is why the statement is considered true: it states a conditional exception rather than a blanket rule. If a terminal cannot be shown to be not susceptible, then SSL/early TLS would not be allowed.

SSL/early TLS is typically discouraged because these protocols have known vulnerabilities and are not suitable for protecting cardholder data in transit. Yet there is a narrowly defined allowance within PCI guidance for POS POI terminals that have been tested and verified as not susceptible to those known exploits. If a device can be demonstrated to be resistant to the identified vulnerabilities and is deployed with appropriate risk controls—such as strong network segmentation, restricted access, and ongoing monitoring—then using SSL/early TLS for that specific terminal can be permitted. This is why the statement is considered true: it states a conditional exception rather than a blanket rule. If a terminal cannot be shown to be not susceptible, then SSL/early TLS would not be allowed.